Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Randall v Chepan [2009] NSWSC 783 — Application To Set & Omission — Barrister AI

Randall v Chepan

[2009] NSWSC 783

Supreme Court of NSW

View on CaseLaw

More

View on CaseLaw

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Application to set
1. aside statutory demand under s 459J Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) - omission
1. of required warning constituted defect in the demand - no injustice caused
1. by defect - failure

Case Details

Citation[2009] NSWSC 783

CourtNSWSC

JurisdictionNew South Wales

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 5 later cases that cite this judgment.

1 of the 5 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.

Cited by5

2023QTM Enterprises (Qld) Pty Ltd v Palmgrove Holdings Pty Ltd trading as Carruthers ContractingQSC 85
2019Aromas Cafe Toowoomba Pty Ltd v Aromas Tea & Coffee Merchants Pty Ltd, in the matter of Aromas Cafe Toowoomba Pty LtdFCA 1699
2016In the matter of Statewide Developments Realty Pty LtdNSWSC 154
2011McElligott v Boyce & OrsQCA 117
and 1 more after sign-in

Relies on15

2009K Young Trading Pty Ltd v TjoiNSWSC 260
2009Hunt & Anor v Kallinicos & OrsNSWCA 5
2008Kallinicos and anor v Hunt and orsNSWSC 149
2007Bentham Management P/L v Union Finance P/LSASC 42
and 11 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works