Bird v Littman [2009] NTSC 33 — Appeal & Adequacy Of Evidence For Conviction — Barrister AI
← Back
Bird v Littman
[2009] NTSC 33
Supreme Court of the Northern Territory
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
Criminal Law
›
APPEAL
›
APPEAL AGAINST CONVICTION
Adequacy of evidence for conviction
›
whether Magistrate’s findings were unreasonable
›
automatism and intention
›
whether there had been a miscarriage of justice
›
appeal dismissed.
Criminal Code, s 1A.
Case Details
Citation
[2009] NTSC 33
Court
NTSC
Jurisdiction
Northern Territory
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works