R v Pw [2009] NTSC 8 — Sexual Offences & Admissibility — Barrister AI
← Back
R v Pw
[2009] NTSC 8
Supreme Court of the Northern Territory
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
+16 more
Criminal Law
›
sexual offences
›
maintaining sexual relationship with child under 16
›
whether s 131A(2) of the Criminal Code requires 3 or more offences against the same provision of the Code
Evidence
›
admissibility
›
recent complaint
›
whether evidence admissible
Evidence
›
admissibility
›
Evidence Act s 26E
›
whether evidence admissible as evidence of facts in issue
Statutes:
Case Details
Citation
[2009] NTSC 8
Court
NTSC
Jurisdiction
Northern Territory
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works