The case confirms that complaint evidence in sexual offence proceedings is admissible under s 4A of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences) Act 1978 (Qld) and that appropriate judicial directions can cure any prejudicial effect. Evidence available at trial that could not have caused a reasonable jury to acquit will not be admitted as fresh evidence on appeal. A sentence of five years imprisonment for maintaining a sexual relationship with a child involving regular oral sex, digital penetration and attempted intercourse over 12-18 months by a step-father against a complainant aged 12-14 is not manifestly excessive.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 7 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 7 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.