Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

R v James, Tappin and Thomas [2009] QSC 93 — The Jury In Criminal Proceedings — Barrister AI

R v James, Tappin and Thomas

[2009] QSC 93

Supreme Court of Queensland

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Jury
2. › THE JURY IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS
3. › IN GENERAL
4. › RESPECTIVE FUNCTIONS OF JUDGE AND JURY
5. › In criminal trial
6. › Where evidence not capable of supporting verdict of guilty of manslaughter
7. › Whether there was evidence that any conduct of the defendants was a substantial or significant cause or substantially contributed to the death
8. › Whether matter to be left to jury
1. Criminal Code s 7(1)(a), s 7(1)(c)
1. Doney v The Queen [1990] HCA 51; (1990) 171 CLR 207 applied
1. R v Sherrington and Kuchler [2001] QCA 105 applied

Case Details

Citation[2009] QSC 93

CourtQSC

JurisdictionQueensland

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.

Cited by1

2023R v Jason Moana RimeneQSC 123

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works