Kent v Gunns Limited

[2009] TASSC 30

Supreme Court of Tasmania

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. Industrial Law
2. › Industrial safety health and welfare
3. › Tasmania
4. › Occupational health and safety legislation
5. › Duties and offences
6. › Workplace Health and Safety Act 1995 (Tas), s9(1)
7. › General duty to ensure the safety of employees so far as is reasonably practicable
8. › Particular obligations created by s9(1)(a)(i)
9. › (iii), (b) and (c)
10. › Separate offences not created by virtue of each of the paragraphs
11. › General duty may be proved by breach of particular obligations.
1. Workplace Health and Safety Act 1995 (Tas), s9(1).
1. Diemould Tooling Services Pty Ltd v Oaten [2008] SASC 197; (2008) 101 SASR 339; Miekeljohn v Central Norseman Gold Corporation Limited (1998) 19 WAR 298, applied.
1. Aust Dig Industrial Law [1359]

Citation[2009] TASSC 30

CourtTASSC

JurisdictionTasmania

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 22 later cases that cite this judgment.

3 of the 22 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.

Already have an account? Sign in