Phillips v Arnold

[2009] TASSC 43

Supreme Court of Tasmania

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. Magistrates
2. › Jurisdiction and procedure generally
3. › Procedure
4. › The hearing
5. › Matters relating to decision
6. › Duty to state reasons
7. › Whether a preference for one witness over another a sufficient reason for conviction.
1. James v Eyles [2007] TASSC 55, applied.
1. Keyte [2000] SASC 382; (2000) 118 A Crim R 463; R v Power [2003] SASC 77; (2003) 141 A Crim R 203, distinguished.
1. Aust Dig [128]

Citation[2009] TASSC 43

CourtTASSC

JurisdictionTasmania

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 61 later cases that cite this judgment.

9 of the 61 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.

Already have an account? Sign in