Tasmania v Mayne

[2009] TASSC 82

Supreme Court of Tasmania

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. Criminal Law
2. › Evidence
3. › Judicial discretion to admit or exclude evidence
4. › Prejudicial evidence
5. › Particular cases
6. › Other matters - Unfavourable witnesses
7. › Prior inconsistent statements tendered
8. › Statements evidence of facts asserted
9. › Witnesses claiming no memory of events or making statements
10. › Effective inability to cross-examine as to asserted facts
11. › Probative value of evidence outweighed by danger of unfair prejudice
12. › Evidence excluded.
1. Evidence Act 2001 (Tas), ss43, 60, 137.
1. R v Suteski [2002] NSWCCA 509; (2002) 56 NSWLR 182; Galvin v R [2001] SASC 343; (2006) 126 A Crim R 449, applied.
1. R v Adam (2001) 207 CLR 96, considered

Citation[2009] TASSC 82

CourtTASSC

JurisdictionTasmania

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.

Already have an account? Sign in