Baron v Tasmania [2009] TASSC 97 — Courts And Judges Generally — Barrister AI
← Back
Baron v Tasmania
[2009] TASSC 97
Supreme Court of Tasmania
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
Procedure
›
Courts and judges generally
›
Judges
›
Disqualification for interest or bias
›
Particular relationships or circumstances
›
Prior relationship of legal advisor and client or opponent
›
Trial judge had acted against accused in relation to his marital break-up nine years previously.
Johnson v Johnson [2000] HCA 48; (2000) 201 CLR 488, Ebner v Official Trustee [2000] HCA 63; (2000) 205 CLR 337, Bienstein v Bienstein [2003] HCA 7; (2003) 195 ALR 225, applied.
Aust Dig Procedure [12]
Case Details
Citation
[2009] TASSC 97
Court
TASSC
Jurisdiction
Tasmania
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
