When assessing an application for registration under s 6(2)(d) of the Health Professions Registration Act 2005 (Vic), the decision-maker must consider all circumstances of the offending including the applicant's moral culpability, not merely the finding of guilt. The decision-maker is not bound to consider the likely effect on public confidence in the profession of the particular registration decision. Where a disqualifying ground in s 6(2) is established, the word 'may' confers a residual discretion to grant registration nonetheless. Conditions restricting a practitioner to a subset of patients (e.g., males over 16) do not necessarily negate the grant of registration or demonstrate unfitness to practise.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 25 later cases that cite this judgment.
4 of the 25 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.