Where an offender disputes statements attributed to them in a pre-sentence report and the dispute would affect the sentence, the sentencing judge cannot rely on the disputed contents without requiring the author to be called to give evidence and be available for cross-examination. The disputed contents constitute inadmissible hearsay without the author's testimony. The Court of Appeal may remit for re-sentencing where it lacks the materials to determine the appropriate sentence itself.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 13 later cases that cite this judgment.
3 of the 13 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.