A total effective sentence of 8 years' imprisonment for 40 indictment offences of aggravated burglary, stealing motor vehicles, and destroying property by fire (total value approximately $500,000) committed over seven years does not infringe the totality principle, even where the offender voluntarily disclosed guilt that would likely not otherwise have been discovered, pleaded guilty at the earliest opportunity, and cooperated with police. The case confirms that voluntary disclosure of unknown guilt, while a significant mitigating factor, does not necessarily render a severe sentence disproportionate where the offending is serious, organised, and prolonged.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 15 later cases that cite this judgment.
2 of the 15 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.