While Tribunal questioning about religious knowledge may be criticised as unfair or methodologically flawed, this does not establish jurisdictional error unless the credibility finding lacks any rational or logical connection to the evidence, and independent credibility findings on other matters may sustain the Tribunal's overall adverse credibility assessment even if the religious knowledge assessment is flawed.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 161 later cases that cite this judgment.
2 of the 161 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.