The Court of Appeal held that where a party's conduct is ambiguous — pointing both towards and against the existence of an agreement — no implied contract can be found. On the facts, the lender's simultaneous pursuit of possession proceedings was inconsistent with any implied agreement to renew the loan, and the primary judge correctly found the borrower had not proved an implied renewal agreement.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.