An Edwards-type consciousness of guilt direction is not required where neither the prosecutor nor the trial judge has invited the jury to engage in consciousness of guilt reasoning from the relevant evidence, the evidence is peripheral to the prosecution case, and experienced trial counsel did not perceive any risk of the jury independently adopting such reasoning. The obligation to give an Edwards direction is triggered by the prosecution's reliance on evidence as demonstrating consciousness of guilt, not merely by the theoretical possibility that a jury might engage in such reasoning.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.
2 of the 2 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.