› whether the plaintiff engaged in conduct which was misleading or deceptive, or likely to mislead or deceive by inducing the defendant to believe that the contract was to be non-binding until further agreement on commissions had taken place
Equity
› ESTOPPEL
› general principles
› whether the plaintiff held out and the defendant relied upon the assumption that the agreement was to be non-binding until further agreement on commissions had taken place
› FIDUCIARY DUTY
› whether the plaintiff was acting as legal advisor to the defendant and thus owed a fiduciary duty to act in the defendant’s best interests
› whether the plaintiff breached this duty by failing to disclose that the agreement between them was legally binding
Case Details
Citation[2010] NSWSC 622
CourtNSWSC
JurisdictionNew South Wales
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.