Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Wood v Inglis [2010] NSWSC 749 — Procedure & Costs — Barrister AI

Wood v Inglis

[2010] NSWSC 749

Supreme Court of NSW

View on CaseLaw

More

View on CaseLaw

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Procedure
1. Costs
1. Held: costs should be borne by the directors or purported directors of the company who had set in motion the retainer of the solicitor
1. interest on costs

Case Details

Citation[2010] NSWSC 749

CourtNSWSC

JurisdictionNew South Wales

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 4 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by4

2016Richtoll Pty Ltd v WW Lawyers (in Liquidation) Pty Ltd (No 3)NSWSC 1010
2015Polias v Ryall (No 2)NSWSC 1
2014Grace v Grace (No 9)NSWSC 1239
2011Lucantonio v Kleinert & Ors (Costs)NSWSC 1642

Relies on8

2009Drummond and Rosen Pty Limited v Easey & Ors [No 2]NSWCA 331
2009Wood v Inglis (Costs)NSWSC 900
2009Sanum-Kehlbeck GMBH & Co KG V Sanum Australia Pty LtdNSWSC 690
2006Joseph Lahoud and Anor v Victor Lahoud and OrsNSWSC 126
and 4 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works