Raga v Berger [2010] NTSC 44 — De Facto Relationships — Barrister AI
← Back
Raga v Berger
[2010] NTSC 44
Supreme Court of the Northern Territory
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
De Facto Relationships
›
Preliminary point to determine duration of de facto relationship and any extension of time to commence proceedings
›
Principles to be applied to applications for extension of time
›
Balance of hardship enlivens a residual discretion
›
Factors relevant to the exercise of the discretion
›
Lack of full disclosure
›
Extension refused.
De Facto Relationships Act 1991 (NT), ss 3A, 14.
Interpretation Act (NT) s 28(1).
Jones v Dunkel [1959] HCA 8; (1959) 101 CLR 298; Ottley v Chester [2010] NTSC 38; Parker v McNair (1990) DFC 95-087; Trelore v Romeo (1991) DFC 95-108;
Case Details
Citation
[2010] NTSC 44
Court
NTSC
Jurisdiction
Northern Territory
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works