R v Byrne

[2010] QCA 33

Queensland Court of Appeal

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal Law
2. › Appeal and new trial
3. › Appeal against sentence
4. › Grounds for interference
5. › Sentence manifestly excessive
6. › Non-parole period
7. › Whether non-parole period manifestly excessive where sentencing judge unaware of co-offenders' sentences and applicant's impaired reasoning
8. › Criminal Code 1899 (Qld), s 408C(1)(c), s 408C(2)(d)
9. › Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth), s 400.3(1)
1. Criminal Law
2. › Sentencing
3. › Parity principle
4. › Co-offenders sentenced in different jurisdictions
5. › Whether disparity between sentence of pawn and instigators warranted reduction in non-parole period
1. Criminal Law
2. › Sentencing
3. › Mitigating factors
4. › Impaired reasoning processes
5. › Whether applicant's apparently impaired rationality reduced culpability and supported early parole eligibility

Quick Take

Where a sentencing judge is unaware of sentences imposed on co-offenders (including in foreign jurisdictions) and of an offender's impaired reasoning processes, the non-parole period may be manifestly excessive even where the head sentence is appropriate. The parity principle extends to consideration of sentences imposed on instigators in foreign jurisdictions for connected offending.

Case Details

Citation[2010] QCA 33

CourtQCA

JurisdictionQueensland

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 4 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by4

2021R v AnquetilNSWCCA 59
2011Henderson v AndrewsQCA 272
2010R v Van Loi NguyenNSWCCA 226
and 1 more after sign-in

Relies on2

2008R v FosterQCA 90
2007R v Huang, R v SiuNSWCCA 259

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in