Courts retain a discretion to refuse to enforce a contractually valid compromise of litigation where the compromise was made contrary to the client's instructions, but the discretion should be exercised with caution and only where grave injustice would result. The power extends to cases where the client originally authorised the offer but subsequently instructed its withdrawal, and the solicitors failed to act on those instructions. On disciplinary appeals, an applicant for leave to appeal on questions of fact must identify specific errors and analyse findings by reference to evidence, rather than merely repeating the evidence urged on the tribunal below.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 11 later cases that cite this judgment.
2 of the 11 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.