UCPR r 668 has limited, if any, application to orders made by the Court of Appeal. Where a party objects to the manner in which the Court of Appeal conducted the hearing, the proper course is to raise the objection with the Court as constituted, not to invoke r 668 after judgment. The rule requires discovery of genuinely new facts, not merely dissatisfaction with the Court's preference for the opponent's submissions on material already known to the applicant.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 4 later cases that cite this judgment.