› where ordinarily a prisoner should be classified as low security prior to parole being granted
› where the respondent has a discretion to approve a prisoner for parole when they have not achieved a low security classification if a parole eligibility date has been set by a court
› whether the respondent failed to observe procedures required by law.
Administrative Law
› JUDICIAL REVIEW
› GROUNDS OF REVIEW
› ERROR OF LAW
› where the respondent considered the applicant’s failure to complete recommended programs as new information that was not before the Court at the time of sentencing under s 192 of the Corrective Services Act 2006 (Qld)
› whether the respondent has erred in law.
Administrative Law
› JUDICIAL REVIEW
› GROUNDS OF REVIEW
› RELEVANT CONSIDERATIONS
› where the applicant is required to complete certain recommended programs before he can progress to a low security classification
› where the applicant has applied to participate in these programs but has been unable to do so, through no fault of his own
› whether the respondent has failed to take into account a relevant consideration.
Corrective Services Act 2006 (Qld) s 192
Case Details
Citation[2010] QSC 264
CourtQSC
JurisdictionQueensland
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 3 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.
