In sexual offence trials where the prosecution case relies solely on the complainant's evidence and the accused gives contradictory evidence, the trial judge must direct the jury on three alternative approaches: accepting the accused's version, accepting the complainant's version, or being unable to determine where the truth lies — and that rejection of the accused's evidence does not lead necessarily to conviction. Additionally, where the complainant was significantly intoxicated, the trial judge must relate the complainant's intoxication to the reliability and credibility of her evidence, not merely to the question of whether she may have lost her inhibitions and consented.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 5 later cases that cite this judgment.
5 of the 5 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.