Regulation 5(a) of the Evidence (Visual Recording of Interviews with Children) Regulations 2004 (WA) is concerned with questions that are leading in substance, not merely in form. A question is not leading in substance merely because it suggests the topic of an answer or embodies material the child has previously given. The 'as far as is practicable' standard requires an objective assessment of the interview as a whole, not a question-by-question analysis. Propensity evidence may have significant probative value notwithstanding a gap of over 20 years between the uncharged acts and the charged conduct, where there is a significant coincidence of circumstances.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 8 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 8 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.