Aramayo and Ors & Vardy and Ors (Civil Dispute) [2011] ACAT 69 — Interim Application - Permanent Stay — Barrister AI
← Back
Aramayo and Ors & Vardy and Ors (Civil Dispute)
[2011] ACAT 69
ACT Civil and Administrative Tribunal
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
+15 more
Civil Dispute
›
interim application - permanent stay
›
withholding of payment pending judgment
›
property in NSW and other NSW elements
›
Tribunal’s jurisdiction to exercise the powers of the Magistrates Court
›
is the ACAT an appropriate forum to decide the matter?
›
degree of connection with the ACT
›
discretion of a court to decline to exercise its jurisdiction
›
the tests of “clearly inappropriate forum” and “clearly more appropriate forum” -
List of legislation: ACT Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2008, s. 22
Magistrates Court Act 1930, s.262
List of cases: Diamond v Bank of London and Montreal Ltd [1979] 1QB 333
Case Details
Citation
[2011] ACAT 69
Court
ACAT
Jurisdiction
Australian Capital Territory
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
