Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Haros v Linfox

[2011] FCA 699

Federal Court of Australia

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Trade Practices
1. representations alleged to be made during the course of negotiations between employer and prospective employee
1. explicitly and by omission
1. whether representations were misleading or deceptive or likely to mislead or deceive

Case Details

Citation[2011] FCA 699

CourtFCA

JurisdictionCommonwealth

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by2

2012Haros v Linfox Australia Pty LtdFCAFC 42
and 1 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works

Haros v Linfox [2011] FCA 699 — Trade Practices & Explicitly And By Omission — Barrister AI