The Autodesk v Dyason (No 2) test for reopening proceedings requires demonstration that the court proceeded on a misapprehension of fact or law not attributable to the applicant's neglect; submissions that merely seek to reargue the case are insufficient. The mere fact that a judge previously heard an interlocutory application in the same matter does not require disqualification.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.