The NSW Court of Appeal refused an adjournment application supported by medical certificates that did not identify symptoms or the degree of the alleged condition, were not supported by verified evidence from the doctor, and therefore provided a wholly inadequate basis for the court to be satisfied of a compelling reason to adjourn. The unexplained withdrawal of instructions from pro bono counsel was also a relevant factor weighing against the adjournment.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 6 later cases that cite this judgment.