PROCEDURE — motion to determine separate question pursuant to Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 28.2 — whether the 'utility, economy and fairness' of determining a separate question is 'beyond question' — strictures of Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 28.2 not satisfactorily met — proposed question reframes separate question already answered — seeking to interpret or review previous answer — inappropriate use of facultative process in Uniform Civil Procedure Rule 28.2 — motion dismissed.
Case Details
Citation[2011] NSWLEC 138
CourtNSWLEC
JurisdictionNew South Wales
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 6 later cases that cite this judgment.
