Heineman v Bradley

[2011] NTSC 105

Supreme Court of the Northern Territory

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. Appeal
2. › Sentencing
3. › Alcohol Court Act 2006
4. › alcohol intervention order
5. › whether the imposition of the maximum alcohol intervention order of 12 months was manifestly excessive in the circumstances.
1. Appeal
2. › Sentencing
3. › manifest excess
4. › whether the imposition of 6 month term of imprisonment as a component of the alcohol intervention order was manifestly excessive.
1. Alcohol Court Act 2006 s 20(1), s 20(2), s 40
1. Traffic Act s 22(1)

Citation[2011] NTSC 105

CourtNTSC

JurisdictionNorthern Territory

The full text is available to signed-in members.

Already have an account? Sign in