Taylor v Bamber & Anor

[2011] NTSC 36

Supreme Court of the Northern Territory

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. Criminal Law
2. › Jurisdiction
3. › Court of Summary Jurisdiction
4. › minor indictable offences
5. › whether Court had jurisdiction under s 121A Justices Act to hear and determine charges
6. › mandatory conditions precedent to Court’s jurisdiction
7. › consent of the prosecutor
8. › whether consent can be implied or must be express
9. › finding that consent must be express
1. Criminal Law
2. › Jurisdiction
3. › Court of Summary Jurisdiction
4. › minor offences
5. › jurisdiction under s 120 Justices Act to deal with matter as a minor offence unconditional as to the consent of the parties
6. › whether facts relating to second charge were inextricably linked with the offending conduct constituting the first and third charges
7. › held no basis for mandamus to compel magistrate to deal with second charge separately
1. Justices Act s 67, s 120, s 121A, s 121A(1)(d)(e) and (f), s 121(1AA), s 122A
1. Mental Health and Related Services Act (NT) s 23(3)(a), s 77, s 77(2), s 77(3), s 77(4)

Citation[2011] NTSC 36

CourtNTSC

JurisdictionNorthern Territory

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.

1 of the 1 citing case carries a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.

Already have an account? Sign in