Cases LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Jaeger-Steigenberger v O'Neill [2011] NTSC 42 — Evidentiary Provisions — Barrister AI

Jaeger-Steigenberger v O'Neill

[2011] NTSC 42

Supreme Court of the Northern Territory

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal Law
2. › evidentiary provisions
3. › elements of possession
4. › burden of proof
5. › circumstantial case
6. › whether reasonable hypothesis consistent with innocence
7. › appeal allowed
1. Appeal and New Trial
2. › possession of unlawful drugs
3. › appeal against conviction
4. › circumstantial evidence
5. › elements of offence of possession
6. › whether reasonable hypothesis consistent with innocence
7. › effect of s 40(c) of Misuse of Drugs Act
8. › appeal allowed
1. Words and Phrases
2. › “possession”
1. Criminal Code, s 1, s 31, s 31(2), s 32

Case Details

Citation[2011] NTSC 42

CourtNTSC

JurisdictionNorthern Territory

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works