R v PJMS (No 2) [2011] NTSC 49 — Evidence & Evidence Act, S 26B, S 26E(1), S 26E(3) — Barrister AI
← Back
R v PJMS (No 2)
[2011] NTSC 49
Supreme Court of the Northern Territory
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
Evidence
›
complaints made by a child of sexual misconduct
›
child has no memory of the incidents
›
admissibility to prove motive by accused to commit sexual acts alleged to have occurred years later
›
whether admissible
›
whether should be excluded on discretionary grounds
›
Evidence Act, s 26E
Evidence Act, s 26B, s 26E(1), s 26E(3)
R v PW [2009] NTSC 8; (2009) 229 FLR 287; followed
HML v The Queen[2008] HCA 16; (2008) 235 CLR 334; referred to
Case Details
Citation
[2011] NTSC 49
Court
NTSC
Jurisdiction
Northern Territory
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
