R v Sullivan

[2011] NTSC 66

Supreme Court of the Northern Territory

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. Criminal Law
2. › admissibility of evidence
3. › confessions and admissions
4. › cross examination of person in custody
5. › whether prejudicial value outweighed any probative value
1. Evidence Act, s 26L
1. Chamberlain (No 2) [1984] HCA 7; (1984) 153 CLR 521; Gibson [1999] NSWCCA 370; (1999) 110 A Crim R 180; Kilby v The Queen [1973] HCA 30; (1973) 129 CLR 460; Murphy v The Queen [1994] SASC 4674; (1994) 62 SASR 121; Pitkin [1995] HCA 30; (1995) 80 A Crim R 302; R v Bloomfield [2003] NTSC 9; Smith v The Queen [1957] HCA 3; (1957) 97 CLR 100; The Queen v Bankowski (1971) 18 FLR 179; Tugaga v The Queen (1994) 74 A Crim R 190; referred to

Citation[2011] NTSC 66

CourtNTSC

JurisdictionNorthern Territory

The full text is available to signed-in members.

Already have an account? Sign in