› Application for oral examination of second defendant to ascertain identity of third party
› finding that second defendant misled plaintiffs as to existence or involvement of third party
› no action taken by second defendant to disabuse plaintiff of their mistaken belief
› avoidance of order for oral examination by late correction of falsehood
› whether costs order against technically successful defendant appropriate in the circumstances
› whether appropriate to order indemnity costs
MS Stock Contracting & Anor v AUX Venture & Anor [2011] NTSC 08, referred to.
Oshlack v Richmond River Council [1993] HCA 11; (1998) 193 CLR 72; Ritter v Godfrey [1920] 2 KB 47; Verna Trading v New India Assurance [1991] VicRp 12; [1991] 1 VR 129, considered.
Case Details
Citation[2011] NTSC 76
CourtNTSC
JurisdictionNorthern Territory
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.
1 of the 1 citing case carries a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.