← Back
Pike v Rigby
[2011] NTSC 97
Supreme Court of the Northern Territory
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
Appeal Against Sentence
›
manifestly excessive
›
negligently causing serious harm
›
young adult
›
one punch
›
home detention
›
appeal dismissed
Criminal Code (NT) s 174E
Sentencing Act s 44, s 45, s 46, s 47, s 48
Dinsdale v The Queen [2000] HCA 54; (2000) 202 CLR 321; Hampton v The Queen [2008] NTCCA 5; Ross v Toohey [2006] NTSC 92, followed
Case Details
Citation
[2011] NTSC 97
Court
NTSC
Jurisdiction
Northern Territory
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
Pike v Rigby [2011] NTSC 97 — Manifestly Excessive & Criminal Code (NT) S 174E — Barrister AI