The Pfennig test for admissibility of similar fact evidence does not require 'striking similarity' as an essential prerequisite; the test is whether there is no reasonable view of the evidence consistent with innocence when considered with other prosecution evidence. Weakness of identification evidence (including photoboard and object identification) is not a ground for exclusion but goes to weight, and a Domican-style warning may be sufficient where the trial judge adequately conveys the limitations of the evidence to the jury.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 2 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.