← Back
AAD Nominees Pty Ltd v Resource Management & Planning Appeal Tribunal
[2011] TASSC 16
Supreme Court of Tasmania
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
Environment and Planning
›
Environmental planning
›
Planning schemes and instruments
›
Tasmania
›
Other matters
›
Constructions of Kingborough Planning Scheme 2000
›
Whether reference to all relevant provisions of the scheme includes desired future character statements.
Craig Williamson Pty Ltd v Barrowcliff [1915] VicLawRp 66; [1915] VLR 450; Registrar of Titles (WA) v Franzon [1975] HCA 41; (1975) 132 CLR 611, applied.
Von Witt v Hobart City Council (1995) 86 LGERA 134, referred to.
Aust Dig Environment and Planning [52]
Case Details
Citation
[2011] TASSC 16
Court
TASSC
Jurisdiction
Tasmania
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
AAD Nominees Pty Ltd v Resource Management & Planning Appeal Tribunal [2011] TASSC 16 — Environmental Planning — Barrister AI