French v McKenna

[2011] TASSC 44

Supreme Court of Tasmania

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. Procedure
2. › Supreme Court Procedure
3. › Tasmania
4. › Practice under Rules of Court
5. › Other matters arising before trial
6. › Non-compliance with order to deliver a statement of claim
7. › Plaintiff's claim dismissed by operation of a self-executing order made by consent
8. › Application to set aside the dismissal order
9. › Jurisdiction to set aside consent order
10. › Order set aside.
1. Supreme Court Rules 2000 (Tas), r374(b).
1. Brocx v Hughes (2008) WASC 34 followed.
1. Pumptech Tasmania Pty Ltd v CB&M Design Solutions Pty Ltd (No 2) (2009) TASSC 78 applied.

Citation[2011] TASSC 44

CourtTASSC

JurisdictionTasmania

The full text is available to signed-in members.

Already have an account? Sign in