An applicant for leave to appeal from VCAT under s 148(1)(a) must identify a question of law (as distinct from a question of fact) that bears directly on the relief sought, and must show sufficient doubt attending that question to justify the grant of leave. Grounds that raise only fact-specific complaints, seek to revisit the merits of a dismissed proceeding, or baldly assert injustice or public importance do not meet this threshold. VCAT costs orders in anti-discrimination proceedings are made under s 109 of the VCAT Act, which requires a cautious approach to preserve access to the Tribunal.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 7 later cases that cite this judgment.