An interlocutory appeal against a trial judge's preliminary ruling on the admissibility of tendency evidence is premature where the ruling was made on an interim basis assuming uncontested evidence, and the evidence has not yet been tested on the voir dire. The Court of Appeal will not consider the correctness of such an interim ruling; the only ruling that matters is the final ruling made after the voir dire.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.