An error as to the applicable maximum penalty may materially affect the exercise of the sentencing discretion, particularly where the sentence imposed represents a high fraction of the erroneously believed maximum. Evidence of uncharged offending led on representative counts outside the relevant timeframes will result in resentencing on a narrower factual basis. The distinction between intermittent and sustained offending is important in assessing overall criminality.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 5 later cases that cite this judgment.