Freedom of information - Exempt matter - Construction of cl 4(2), cl 4(3), cl 5(1)(e), cl 5(1)(f), cl 5(1)(g) of sch 1 of the Freedom of Information Act 1992 (WA)
Administrative law - Whether findings made by the Information Commissioner that a document did not contain material of commercial value and that the Appellant would be likely to continue to use documents after they were released were findings which were not open to him
Administrative law - Whether conclusion by Information Commissioner that a measure of restricting access to information would remain in place even though the documents were released was perverse
Administrative law - Whether findings were irrational, illogical, and not based upon findings or inferences of fact supported by logical grounds
Case Details
Citation[2011] WASC 283
CourtWASC
JurisdictionWestern Australia
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 8 later cases that cite this judgment.