The one transaction rule does not mandate concurrent sentences for offences committed as part of one episode of criminal conduct. Destruction of evidence (here, burning a stolen vehicle used in the commission of other offences) constitutes a separate offence warranting cumulative sentencing, even when committed shortly after the primary offences. A fraud offence committed weeks later and of a different character also warrants cumulation.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 17 later cases that cite this judgment.
7 of the 17 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.