Circumstantial identification evidence (that the offender 'looked similar' to the accused) combined with DNA evidence placing the accused in a getaway vehicle is insufficient to prove identity beyond reasonable doubt where there is no evidence connecting the accused's presence in the vehicle to the time of the offence. However, evidence that the vehicle was stolen shortly before the offence is admissible to narrow the temporal window and negate innocent association, and its wrongful exclusion at trial may justify a new trial rather than acquittal.
The full text is available to signed-in members.