A reference appeal under s 37S of the Supreme Court Act 1933 (ACT) requires the applicant to identify a question of law that actually arose at or in relation to the proceeding — it is not sufficient to identify settled legal obligations that were not in dispute and then complain that the trial judge failed to apply them. The distinction between a 'question of law' and an 'error of law' is jurisdictional: the Court of Appeal can decide the former on a reference appeal but has no jurisdiction to consider the latter.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.