A trial judge's observations that there is 'nothing in the evidence of the accused' to explain prosecution evidence (such as bruising or forensic evidence) create a real risk that the jury will understand the accused bears some onus to provide an explanation, constituting a misdirection. Where a trial judge has focussed at length on evidence damaging to the accused's credibility, a [name withheld] direction in the three-step form set out in Anderson is especially important.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.
1 of the 1 citing case carries a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.