Tilley v R (No 2)

[2012] ACTCA 58

ACT Court of Appeal

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal Law
2. › Sentencing
3. › Non-parole period
4. › Periodic detention
5. › Whether non-parole period can co-terminate with portion of sentence served by periodic detention
6. › Crimes (Sentencing) Act 2005 (ACT), ss 11(4)(a), 64, pt 5.2

Quick Take

Under the Crimes (Sentencing) Act 2005 (ACT), a non-parole period cannot co-terminate with a portion of a sentence to be served by periodic detention, because s 64 excludes periodic detention sentences from the non-parole period provisions in pt 5.2.

Case Details

Citation[2012] ACTCA 58

CourtACTCA

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members.

Relies on2

2012Tilley v RACTCA 57
2012Welch v R: Beattie v R: Sherd v RACTCA 14

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in