Watson v Australian Community Pharmacy Authority

• 1. Administrative Law
  2. › Judicial review
  3. › No evidence ground
  4. › Section 5(1)(h) and s 5(3) of Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth)
  5. › Whether no evidence or other material to justify decision
  6. › Whether decision-maker could reasonably be satisfied particular matter was established
  7. › Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth), ss 5(1)(h), 5(3)
• 1. Administrative Law
  2. › Judicial review
  3. › Jurisdictional fact
  4. › Whether satisfaction of decision-maker as to particular matter constitutes jurisdictional fact
  5. › Non-specialist body required to be 'satisfied' of matter
  6. › Whether court may go behind decision-maker's satisfaction
  7. › National Health Act 1953 (Cth), s 90
  8. › National Health (Australian Community Pharmacy Authority Rules) Determination 2006 (Cth), sch 2 item 201(a)
• 1. Administrative Law
  2. › Statutory interpretation
  3. › Meaning of 'legal right to occupy' premises
  4. › Whether requirement extends to investigation of property law
  5. › Whether oral agreement or licence sufficient
  6. › Composition and expertise of decision-making body relevant to construction
  7. › National Health (Australian Community Pharmacy Authority Rules) Determination 2006 (Cth), sch 2 item 201(a)
• 1. Practice and Procedure
  2. › Application to reopen appeal after hearing concluded and judgment reserved
  3. › Application to amend notice of appeal
  4. › Application to adduce further evidence
  5. › Whether evidence deliberately withheld at trial
  6. › Whether evidence of sufficient probative value
  7. › Federal Court Act 1976 (Cth), s 27

Quick Take