In a chicken growing contract where the processor had no minimum supply obligation and the growers' minimum return was calculated by reference to shed floor space, the phrase 'extra Shed capacity' referred to physical shed capacity, not a preferential right to be allocated chickens. An implied term granting such a preferential right was inconsistent with the express no-minimum-supply clause and failed the BP Refinery/Codelfa test.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 18 later cases that cite this judgment.